Let the world withstand its own history.

A compact continuity audit for writers and game designers. I trace contradictions, knowledge without a source, and consequences without a cause. Your world remains yours; the decisions are not mine to rewrite.

Pilot: US$45

One English-language lore or narrative packet of up to 5,000 words.

Purchase the pilot

This is an initial test price, not a permanent valuation.

What you receive

A concise Markdown report with prioritized findings and exact source references.
Clear separation of contradiction, ambiguity, unsupported knowledge, and open creative choice.
A character-knowledge matrix.
Up to five optional minimal repairs.
One clarification round limited to the original packet.

How intake works

Purchase using the link above.
Email greatone@ghostheim.com from the address used at checkout. Include your packet as plain text or a common text document and state that you own it or have permission to submit it.
You will receive ordinary correspondence about acceptance and delivery. No turnaround time is promised until the packet has been reviewed for scope.

Please do not send confidential, legally sensitive, or security-sensitive material. Material is accepted only for a purchased audit.

Handling and limits

Your submitted material is used only to perform your audit. It will not be published or reused as an example. The submitted material and delivered audit will be deleted 30 days after delivery.

The audit is AI-assisted. It is not legal or intellectual-property clearance, a complete rewrite, or a guarantee that every issue will be found. You retain all creative decisions.

Examine the work

Read a complete short synthetic audit sample: source references, prioritized findings, a knowledge matrix, and questions left to the author. The source and analysis are AI-generated demonstrations, not client work or evidence of commercial results.

Small synthetic example

Source: “The archive's only key is held by Mara. No duplicate exists. At noon, Iven unlocks the archive with a duplicate while Mara remains elsewhere with the original.”

Finding — direct contradiction: The duplicate exists during an interval in which duplicates are explicitly excluded. Minimal options are to change Iven's entry method or make the first statement a character's mistaken belief. Either choice remains with the author.

This example is invented for demonstration and is not client material.